NYX Lip IV vs NYX Liquid Suede Cream Lipstick

Safety scores favor NYX Lip IV (79) over NYX Liquid Suede (68). Both are lip products, so sensible use includes avoiding application on broken skin and stopping use if you experience irritation. The biggest real-world “safety-adjacent” considerations in the provided reviews are comfort issues: Liquid Suede is more frequently associated with dryness/flaking, which can make lips feel uncomfortable for some users.

Lip IV’s higher skin compatibility and comfort scores suggest fewer routine issues for typical wear. Neither product’s provided data includes clinical testing details; the scores and comments are best interpreted as user experience signals rather than medical evidence.

Comfort is a decisive win for NYX Lip IV (88 vs 62). Buyers repeatedly describe Lip IV as hydrating, smooth, and easy to wear, with some using it as a comfortable alternative to drying stains. Liquid Suede can feel creamy on application, but multiple reviews mention that it isn’t moisturizing and may flake or feel dry later, especially without lip prep.

If you dislike tight-feeling matte liquid lipsticks, Lip IV is the safer pick. If you can tolerate (or prefer) a drier matte feel for the look, Liquid Suede can still be a good match.

Both are fairly easy to use, with Lip IV scoring 86 and Liquid Suede 84. Lip IV’s gloss format tends to be more forgiving, and reviews mention smooth application and the option to blot for a stain. Liquid Suede is also straightforward, but because it sets matte, users may need to work a bit faster for even edges and avoid disturbing the product while it dries to reduce transfer.

If you want low-fuss application and a wearable fade, Lip IV feels simpler. If you want crisp matte results, Liquid Suede is still accessible but benefits from a bit more technique and lip prep.

Application scores are strong for both, with Lip IV at 89 and Liquid Suede at 85. Lip IV reviews highlight a smooth, silky swipe and an applicator that makes lines easier for some users. Liquid Suede is also described as creamy and pigmented, often needing only one layer, but matte set-down can make any unevenness or dry spots more noticeable over time.

If you want a more forgiving application that can be worn glossy or blotted, Lip IV has the edge. If you want one-swipe opacity in a matte finish, Liquid Suede is the better match.

Skin compatibility is one of the clearest separators. NYX Lip IV scores 82, while NYX Liquid Suede scores 58. Lip IV is repeatedly described as hydrating and comfortable, and its “gloss-to-stain” wear style can be more forgiving on lips that get dry.

Liquid Suede has many fans, but reviews commonly mention dryness, flaking, and the need for lip prep (balm/exfoliation) to keep the finish looking smooth. If you’re prone to dry-feeling matte formulas, Lip IV is the safer option based on the provided data.

NYX Liquid Suede leads on shade range score (82 vs 74 for Lip IV). That suggests Liquid Suede offers a stronger overall spread of options or better fit across preferences. Lip IV is described as coming in saturated shades, but buyer feedback flags that shades can look different than expected in real life.

If shade selection and predictable shade shopping matter most, Liquid Suede has the advantage on scoring. If you choose Lip IV, it may be worth checking multiple swatches and being open to exchanging shades if the tone pulls differently on you.

Finish quality favors NYX Lip IV (90 vs 86). If your priority is a smooth, high-shine, wet-look finish, Lip IV is purpose-built for that result and reviews frequently praise the gloss effect. Liquid Suede’s matte finish is still strong and widely liked, but matte formulas can emphasize texture more easily—especially when the product runs dry or begins to flake for some users.

In short: Lip IV wins for shine and a smoother-looking finish; Liquid Suede remains a solid choice for a bold matte look.

Longevity is close: Lip IV scores 82 and Liquid Suede scores 80. Lip IV’s wear tends to shift from glossy to stained—so even if the shine fades after eating or drinking, some color can remain. Liquid Suede is often described as lasting for hours, but reviews are mixed on whether it stays transfer-light during eating (some report smudging or wear-off with meals).

If you like the idea of a “fade into a stain” wear pattern, Lip IV can feel more predictable. If you want a matte look that stays intact, Liquid Suede can work well, but performance may vary with meals and lip prep.

Scent scoring favors Lip IV (74 vs 50). Lip IV is described by some reviewers as having a faint coconut/oil-like smell and taste that they consider subtle rather than overwhelming. For Liquid Suede, the provided reviews focus more on finish, wear, and dryness than fragrance, and the lower scent score suggests scent may be less pleasant or less consistent to users.

If you’re sensitive to fragrance, Lip IV’s scent still may be noticeable during application, but it’s often described as light. With Liquid Suede, the scent experience is less clear from the provided feedback.

Durability scores favor NYX Lip IV (80) over NYX Liquid Suede (74). For consumable makeup, this largely reflects how reliably the product stays usable and performs through normal wear. Lip IV’s stain effect can help it look more even as the gloss layer wears down. Liquid Suede can look excellent when fresh, but reviews note flaking and wear changes with meals, which can reduce that “still looks good” durability later in the day.

Neither product is a tool/device, so durability here is more about wear stability and day-to-day consistency than hardware longevity.

Personalization is a tie by score (80 vs 80), but the type of personalization differs. Lip IV offers a gloss-to-stain experience with saturated shades and medium-to-high pigment, which can suit users who want shine options and a stain fade. Liquid Suede’s higher shade range score suggests more variety in color selection, and the matte/full-coverage format suits users who want more dramatic payoff.

If you personalize by finish and feel, Lip IV may fit better. If you personalize by matte shades and coverage, Liquid Suede has the edge.

Ingredient quality scores are moderate for both: Lip IV 72 and Liquid Suede 67. Lip IV highlights ingredients like magnesium, vitamin B12, and coconut water in its description, while Liquid Suede mentions avocado oil and vitamin E. However, the provided information doesn’t include full ingredient lists or independent testing, so these callouts shouldn’t be treated as proof of superior formula quality.

Practically, comfort feedback aligns more strongly with Lip IV, while Liquid Suede’s reviews more often mention dryness—suggesting that whichever “nourishing” ingredients are included, the overall feel still depends on the formula’s matte vs glossy design.

Packaging quality scores are modestly higher for Lip IV (78) than Liquid Suede (72). Lip IV reviewers mention the wand/applicator shape positively, which can improve control and reduce mess. Liquid Suede packaging is typical for a liquid lipstick, but some feedback mentions the tube doesn’t feel like it contains much product, even though unit amount is listed as 4 mL.

If applicator performance matters most, Lip IV has the clearer positive feedback. If you’re choosing primarily on value, Liquid Suede still scores well overall despite a slightly lower packaging score.

NYX Liquid Suede wins on value (90 vs 85) and is priced lower in the provided listings ($9.81 vs $11.97). Reviews also frequently describe it as impressive for the price, especially for bold pigment and matte payoff. That said, value isn’t only about cost—Liquid Suede’s dryness and mixed transfer feedback can mean extra steps (lip prep, touch-ups) for some users.

Lip IV costs a bit more but offers a dual-wear experience (shine + stain) and a stronger comfort profile, which many buyers may consider worth paying for if they dislike drying matte formulas.

Brand trust is effectively a tie, with NYX Lip IV at 81 and Liquid Suede at 82. Both products come from the same brand and both listings emphasize cruelty-free positioning. With similar review volume and strong customer satisfaction scores, confidence is more likely to hinge on the formula style (gloss-stain vs matte liquid lipstick) than on brand reliability differences between the two.

Customer satisfaction is extremely close, with Lip IV at 87 (4.3/5 from 11,794 reviews) and Liquid Suede at 88 (4.4/5 from 15,539 reviews). Lip IV buyers frequently praise shine, smoothness, and a hydrating feel, with recurring complaints centered on shade accuracy. Liquid Suede buyers often praise pigment and matte finish, but the repeated negatives are dryness/flaking and inconsistent transfer resistance.

If you want the safer “feel” experience, Lip IV’s feedback is more consistently positive on comfort. If you want a matte statement lip at a strong price, Liquid Suede’s satisfaction remains high despite the dryness trade-off.

Claim support slightly favors NYX Lip IV (83 vs 79). Lip IV’s key promises—wet shine, stain effect over time, and hydration—match the way many reviewers describe it (gloss first, tint later, comfortable feel), though not every user agrees it lasts all day without touch-ups. Liquid Suede’s claims around long wear and “waterproof” performance are supported by many reviews praising staying power, but there’s clearer disagreement on smudge/transfer behavior and dryness, which lowers consistency.

Overall, both products have reasonably supported performance narratives, but Lip IV’s wear pattern (gloss fading into stain) aligns more consistently with the feedback provided.

Both products have ethical transparency signals via cruelty-free positioning, but Liquid Suede scores higher (85 vs 78). Both listings state NYX is certified/acknowledged by PETA as cruelty-free. Lip IV is also described as vegan in the title, which is an additional disclosed positioning, though the scoring provided still rates Liquid Suede higher on ethical transparency overall.