NYX Lip IV vs NYX Mineral Matte Finishing Powder

Both products score reasonably well for safety: Lip IV 79 and Mineral Matte Powder 82. As a lip product, Lip IV safety considerations are mainly practical—avoid using if you experience irritation, and be mindful of any sensitivity to scent/flavor (some reviewers notice a coconut-like smell/taste). For the loose powder, avoid inhaling product during application and be cautious around the eye area; one review mentions flashback, which is more of a cosmetic/photography concern than a safety one. For either product, patch testing is a sensible step if you’re reactive.

Comfort slightly favors Lip IV (88) over the powder (85). Lip IV is repeatedly described as hydrating, smooth, and comfortable, with some noting only mild initial stickiness typical of gloss. The powder is often described as lightweight and non-cakey, with users appreciating that it doesn’t feel heavy on the skin. If you dislike any tackiness, the powder may feel more “invisible,” but if you want lips to feel moisturized, Lip IV has the stronger comfort profile.

NYX Lip IV is the easier product for most routines, scoring 86 vs the powder’s 83. Lip IV is a swipe-on product with a wand applicator that reviewers praise for shaping and holding product. Loose setting powder can be straightforward, but it’s easier to over-apply, create fallout, or run into undertone/flashback issues if you apply heavily—especially for beginners. If you want the simplest application with minimal tools, Lip IV tends to be lower effort.

Application scores favor Lip IV (89) over Mineral Matte Powder (82). Reviewers commonly describe Lip IV as applying smoothly with a comfortable feel and a well-designed applicator. The powder generally blends easily and takes “very little,” but loose powder application can be more technique-dependent (brush vs puff, how much you tap off, and where you place it). If you want precision without extra tools, Lip IV has the advantage; if you’re comfortable working with loose powder, Mineral Matte is still very workable.

Shade-related performance is a weak spot for both, but in different ways. Lip IV has a better shade range score (74), yet reviews frequently warn that online swatches and shade names can be inaccurate, with shades pulling more red/pink/brown than expected. Mineral Matte Powder scores lower (62) and has mixed feedback: some find it blends well across seasons, while others report an ashy cast or poor match—suggesting undertone and depth range can be limiting. If shade match is critical, expect some trial-and-error either way.

Finish quality is a clear differentiator: Lip IV scores 90 for a glossy, wet-shine look, while Mineral Matte Powder scores 84 for a matte/natural finish. Reviews for Lip IV emphasize high shine and a smooth feel that can be worn glossy or blotted to focus on the stain. Reviews for the powder emphasize lightweight mattifying that looks natural rather than heavy. Choose based on finish preference—glossy lips vs a more matte complexion.

Longevity favors NYX Lip IV (82) over the Mineral Matte Powder (78). Many Lip IV reviews describe hours of wear and a stain that remains after the gloss fades, although greasy foods and drinking can shorten the effect. The powder is often described as lasting all day for setting and shine control, but one review notes it’s not the longest-lasting powder and another flags flashback as a situational downside. In practical terms: Lip IV’s “stain” can extend perceived wear, while the powder’s longevity depends on skin type and environment.

Scent performance strongly favors the Mineral Matte Powder (92) over Lip IV (74). Multiple powder reviews mention no odor, which is helpful if you’re sensitive to fragrance. Lip IV has repeated mentions of a coconut-like smell/taste—often described as faint and “natural,” but still present during application for some. If you prefer unscented makeup, the powder is the safer pick.

Durability slightly favors Lip IV (80) over the powder (74). For consumable makeup, “durability” tends to show up as packaging sturdiness and whether the product stays usable without drying out or breaking. Lip IV’s stain format can reduce the need for constant reapplication once the tint remains. The powder is still generally stable, but loose powder jars are more prone to spills and product mess over time if not handled carefully.

Personalization favors Lip IV (80) over Mineral Matte Powder (66). Lip IV is described as coming in many shades (the listing mentions 16 saturated shades and also “available in 20 lip stains”), giving more room to choose intensity and tone—though swatch accuracy is a known issue. The powder is offered in specific shade groupings like Light/Medium, and reviews show mixed experiences with undertone match and ashiness. If you need more options to fine-tune your look, Lip IV is the more flexible of the two.

Ingredient quality scores are mid-to-good for both, with Lip IV at 72 and Mineral Matte Powder at 68. Lip IV lists specific highlighted ingredients (Magnesium, Vitamin B12, coconut water; Vitamin B12 and antioxidants are noted), which supports some transparency about what’s featured in the formula, though this isn’t the same as proving performance benefits. For the powder, the listing focuses more on finish and lightweight feel than ingredient callouts. If ingredient callouts matter to you, Lip IV provides more to go on from the provided data, but neither product’s ingredient list is fully detailed here.

Packaging is close, with a slight edge to the powder: Lip IV scores 78 and the Mineral Matte Powder scores 79. Lip IV comes in a tube/bottle format with a wand; reviewers like the applicator shape and how much product it holds. The powder’s jar packaging is praised by at least one reviewer for holding up well in a makeup bag without cracking or leaking, though loose powders can be inherently messier. Pick based on preference: wand convenience vs jar durability.

Value is the clearest win for NYX Mineral Matte Finishing Powder, with a 90 value score versus Lip IV’s 85. Reviews repeatedly describe the powder as “best for your money,” effective with only a small amount needed, and comparable to higher-end options. Lip IV is also considered a good buy given its shine + stain versatility and strong performance scores, but it’s a more specialized lip item with a smaller quantity (0.16 oz). If budget-to-performance is your top metric, the powder leads.

Brand trust is nearly tied: Lip IV scores 81 and the powder scores 80. Both are NYX PROFESSIONAL MAKEUP products with cruelty-free messaging (PETA acknowledged in the listings) and substantial review volume. The small differences come down more to product-specific consistency—Lip IV’s shade accuracy concerns and the powder’s shade/ashiness and flashback mentions—rather than brand reliability overall.

Customer satisfaction is very close, with the powder slightly ahead: Lip IV scores 87 (4.3★ from 11,794 reviews) and Mineral Matte scores 88 (4.4★ from 7,443 reviews). Lip IV’s praise centers on shine, smooth feel, hydration, and a stain that lasts for hours; recurring complaints focus on shade differences from swatches and variable longevity depending on eating. The powder’s praise centers on setting, mattifying without caking, and value; recurring complaints focus on shade match (ashy for some) and one mention of flashback.

Claim support is strong for both based on scores and review alignment: Lip IV scores 83 and Mineral Matte scores 84. Lip IV’s “instant wet shine” and “over-time stain” are echoed by reviewers describing a glossy initial look and lingering tint after blotting or wear. The powder’s claims around setting and a matte/natural finish align with many comments about controlling shine, preventing creasing/caking, and keeping makeup looking natural. Neither product includes clinical-grade evidence in the provided data, so interpret support as user experience + product design fit.

Ethical transparency is a tie on score (78 each) based on the provided data. Both listings emphasize cruelty-free status and note NYX is acknowledged by PETA as a cruelty-free brand. Lip IV also states a vegan formula in the title. Beyond those points, no additional sustainability or sourcing details are provided here, so comparisons should remain limited to the cruelty-free/vegan information available.